|
New Page 1
|
Rocky Road
(December 1999)
Duing the last three months of 1999
a number of companies were reported as having operational
difficulties associated with new ERP systems. In some cases the
companies openly blamed SAP (and other ERP vendors), and one company
has even filed a lawsuit against PeopleSoft and their implementors.
Here’s our take on the story:
Hershey’s – Just prior to Halloween 1999, Hershey’s
reported a 19% drop in 3rd quarter net earnings, and
placed part of the blame on "computer problems". The
problems facing the maker of Hershey’s chocolate bars and Kisses,
Reese’s Peanut Butter Cups and Kit Kats could continue through the
high margin Christmas season and on through to Easter 2000. Analysts
have estimated that the loss in sales could be $100 in the fourth
quarter alone, and that they could wind up losing 0.5% market share
in the US. According to Hershey’s, the problems lie within their
new order-and distribution system that uses software from both SAP
and Siebel Systems. Since the system went live in July 1999, Hershey’s
have been unable to fill orders 100% and get their products onto the
shelves. SAP have been working with Hershey’s to fix the problems,
and - as far as we know - Hershey’s have not actually blamed
anyone for their troubles.
Whirlpool – In early November 1999, the Wall Street Journal ran
a story about Whirlpool blaming delays in shipping it’s appliances
in part to it’s SAP implementation which went live two months
prior. Apparently, orders for quantities smaller than one truckload
had faced snags in the areas of order processing, tracking, and
invoicing. CNET have reported that SAP "gave Whirlpool the red
light" twice prior to their go-live, saying that their supply
chain was not ready.
Other companies (including Allied Waste) have joined in the
chorus, but with little detail.
One company – W.L. Gore and Associates have even filed a
lawsuit. Bloomberg News reported at the end of October that the
makers of Gore-Tex (a waterproof, Teflon-based fiber used in outdoor
wear such as Timberland boots) had filed suit against PeopleSoft and
Deloitte & Touche over an allegedly botched attempt to install
PeopleSoft’s HR module. Gore apparently ended up paying D&T
twice D&T’s original estimate, and in the end had to bring in
another implementor to "re-implement" the system.
PeopleSoft are being sued as well because – it seems – they
recommended D&T. According to the report, "Gore seeks
compensation in the millions of dollars for damages it suffered
because of PeopleSoft’s and D&T’s scheme to defraud and
failure to perform as promised". Harsh words indeed.
This is all on top of the still unresolved $500 million lawsuit
filed by the bankruptcy trustee for FoxMeyer (a former $5 billion
drug distribution company) against Andersen Consulting,
"alleging the company’s botched implementation of SAP’s R/3
software helped send FoxMeyer into bankruptcy in 1996." It is
interesting to note that, according to CNET, at the time Andersen
called the claims "outlandish and totally at odds with
facts".
So. What does this all mean? Who is at fault? How many more are
going to come out of the woodwork? Is this Y2K related? What can be
done to prevent these problems in the future? So many questions …
Of course no one has all the answers, but we would suggest that
it is critical for customers, consultants and SAP (and other ERP
vendors) to hold open, honest dialogue at the start of the project,
and nail down the critical success factors of the implementation,
including:
- The customer’s expectations
- SAP product capabilities, and gaps
- The level of change the customer has to go through to make the
system fit
- The level of commitment within the customer organization to
see the project through to completion
- The customers organization and culture, and the fit between
the customers organization and culture and the project
organization and culture
- The risks presented by politics within the customer
organization, and
- The consultant’s capabilities, responsibilities and role (if
applicable)
|
New Page 1
|